Compare and contrast two of the following approaches to project management: PRINCE2; Systems Engineering; and Agile project management.

Assignment: You have recently been appointed to a Program Office role reporting to

the Program Office Manager in an Australian-based organisation with

offices worldwide. The organisation provides a diversified portfolio of

architectural design, construction and facilities management services,

maintains its own substantial IT infrastructure and is anticipating the need

to manage significant organisational change over the coming decade. The

Program Office has exclusively supported project management based on

the PMBOK Guide, but is looking to support one additional approach to

project management, to support future capability growth.

Your task is to compare and contrast two of the following approaches to

project management: PRINCE2; Systems Engineering; and Agile project

management. You are requested to compare these approaches, but not to

recommend one of the approaches. Your manager is looking for

information on which they can make a decision, not for your decision or

recommendation. Your manager has a Ph.D. and is likely to appreciate a

referenced evidence in your analysis.

Task 1: Analysis Framework

Word count: Up to 500 words

Description: Select and / or develop one or more frameworks for comparing and

contracting two of the following: PRINCE2; Systems Engineering; and

Agile project management. Define a basis for comparing the chosen

approaches. The same Analysis Framework must be used to compare

both of the project management approaches you select.

Task 2: Analyse your first approach to project management

Word count: Up to 1500, excluding references

Description: Analyse one of the approaches to project management that you have

selected according to the Analysis Framework you have developed /

selected in Task 1. Your analysis of the selected approaches to project

management must be thorough and sufficiently comprehensive for

someone else to make a decision between the approaches presented in

Task 2 and Task 3.

Task 3: Analyse your second approach to project management

Word count: Up to 1500, excluding references

Description: As Task 2

The analyses conducted in Task 2 and Task 3 should be able to be read

independent of each other. They will be marked separately.

Marking Criteria:

Task 1: No marks are provided for Task 1 directly. The quality of your submission

for Task 1 is assessed in relation to Tasks 2 and 3.

Task 2 & 3: – Consistency between the literature and your description of the selected

approaches to project management (P-1: Foundational Knowledge)

– Appropriate and effective use of referencing and ability to follow

assignment submission and preparation instructions (P-1: Foundational

Knowledge)

– Appropriate and effective choice of analysis framework, and its

suitability to the approach to project management analysed (R-1: Critical

Engagement)

– Depth of analysis and evidence of critical engagement with which the

project management approach (R-1: Critical Engagement)

– How clearly were significant aspects of the project management

approaches described (C-2: Written Communication)

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER BELOW TO GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT. See also, capstone project assignment help in UAE, UK, USA