MKT6B2 – SERVICES MARKETING – SS13 ASSESSMENT 1 – SERVICE ENCOUNTER JOURNAL
MKT6B2 – SERVICES MARKETING – SS13 ASSESSMENT 1 – SERVICE ENCOUNTER JOURNAL
Overview
This assessment is designed to get you thinking about and applying theoretical constructs in
your everyday activities. It is a two stage process. You are asked to record individual service
encounters over a period of time as described below. You are then asked to produce a report
analysing these encounters using a range of appropriate theoretical constructs.
Rationale for Assignment
The goal of the service journal is to help you understand and evaluate the service encounter (i.e.
the customer/client – service provider interaction; or, for example, the service interaction
between two departments within an organisation). The journal is designed to help you record
information about service encounters ranging from satisfactory to unsatisfactory.
Learning Outcomes to be met by the Assignment
A10, B10, C8, C10, D9
Knowledge and Skills to be assessed
Observation
Synthesis of theoretical constructs
Reflection on experiences
JOURNAL ENTRIES
People have a number of service encounters each week, both at work and in their own time,
with different service providers such as restaurants, banks, haircutters, utilities, government
agencies, emergency services and so forth. You are required to record information about two
service encounters, based on your own first-hand experience, each week for four weeks (so 8
encounters in total). The important thing is that you record details as soon as possible after the
encounter.
Collect a variety of types of encounters. Try to include at least one not-for-profit organisation.
Record only experiences that you are willing to share with the class. Do not record personal or
sensitive topics. Record your information on the attached entry form. One blank copy is
attached – make copies for yourself. Each entry will correspond to one service encounter in a
given week. Journal entries should be typed so that they can be submitted electronically.
Record at least two encounters that were very satisfying and two encounters that were very
dissatisfying. Be specific. (e.g., if the service encounter was by telephone, were you put on
hold? How many times? For how long? What message/music was played? Etc.) The best way to
complete a journal entry form is to fill it out immediately following a particular incident. If you try
to do your entries from memory or do too many at one time, the quality of the entries is likely to
suffer.
ANALYSING JOURNAL ENTRIES
Develop two copies of a report in which the service encounter journal entries are analysed. Use
relevant course concepts in discussing your encounters (e.g. 'PZB's' gaps model,
servicescapes, customer loyalty cycle etc. ). Be specific in your references to your service
encounters (e.g. employee actions). Service encounters can be from any country (i.e. does NOT
just have to be UK)
In your report identify the sources and actions that seem to account for satisfaction (or
effectiveness) or dissatisfaction with services.(e.g how would you describe yourself as a service
customer/user?) Also, how would you describe yourself as a service provider? Refer to course
concepts concerning the psychology of customer/user satisfaction. (e.g. what were your
expectations regarding the different service encounters? What elements of the service seem to
be most important for creating satisfaction? How do service operations and IT systems work
together in these encounters?)
Assess the causes of performance problems in the services you encountered or delivered. What
are the benefits to the organisation, customer/user and employee of correcting the performance
problem? What are the costs of failing to take action? What are the alternative ways to improve
service delivery? How difficult/costly would these changes be? What other information would be
useful to assist in making improved decisions with regards to these service encounters?
Remember : We are looking for analysis of the encounters, with application of
appropriate theoretical constructs. Students who spend most of their time and effort
describing the encounters are missing the point, and will not score well.
The typed report should not exceed 3,000 double-spaced words, with the journal entries as
appendices.
Comments on the report
The main part of the report is where you draw the lessons you have learned from reflecting on all
your encounters. What things strike you once you look back on all of them as important. Is it,
Service Recovery, the role of front-line staff, the importance of the Servicescape etc. I suggest
that you should pick 4-6 points and show how some of your encounters map onto them.
So for instance if one of your issues was the importance of Service Recovery, you could say
what you thought it important, and then draw links to say a Restaurant encounter where it was
done well (the waiter offered the desert for free ….) and another encounter (e.g. the Bakerloo
line !!!!) where it was bad because ….
You do NOT need to link ALL of your encounters to each of the 4-6 things that you have
identified, but you are illustrating how some of them link (and hence your basis for identifying it
as an issue in the first place
My suggestion is that you do NOT structure the report explicitly round the Gaps model per se,
with each of the 5 gaps being one of the 5 issues you have ‘found’. While some people have
done this approach well in the past, most students who have tried doing it this way seem to have
got lost in the detail, and ended up not doing very well. I am not stopping you doing it, just
advising that many of your colleagues have found this a difficult way of doing it.
Whatever way you do it, you should identify some recommendations as to what particular
service organisations, or service marketers in general, should do following your experiences
You may have to read ahead in the book to use appropriate tools and techniques to cover your
particular encounters (i.e. don’t assume that the only tools and techniques that could be useful
will have been covered in class prior to hand-in of the report)
The focus of the main report is NOT about describing the encounters – the journal entries in the
appendix do that. What you are trying to do is stand back from the detail of the particular entries
to see what broad things you have found, in part by applying appropriate tools and techniques
and then using selected examples from the encounters to flesh out the technique or point under
discussion.
Progress-check
To encourage early participation, and to make sure that you are on track, all students should be
prepared to give a progress check in class with examples of journals they have already
captured
Assessment
You will be assessed on the following
Use of course constructs (30%)
Identification of main service issues (20%)
Appropriateness of recommendations (20%)
Communication as a business report (30%)
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER BELOW TO GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT.
See also, capstone project assignment help in UAE, UK, USA

