What is the evidence for synergy and what were the reasons for failure in the two examples: Quaker Oats and Snapple, and Sony Pictures Entertainment?
What is the evidence for synergy and what were the reasons for failure in the two examples: Quaker Oats and Snapple, and Sony Pictures Entertainment?
Synergy is the concept that the performance and value of two business organizations merged is
greater than total sum of the individual business units. As such, this term is commonly used in
situations of mergers and acquisitions. Prospective financial benefit attained through
combination of two or more companies is actually the impetus of most mergers and acquisitions.
Shareholders benefit if share price increases after sealing off a merger because of its synergistic
effect. Generally, prospective synergy realized through a merger is an outcome of various
factors such as combination of talents and technologies, cost reduction and increased revenues.
The major goal of mergers and acquisitions is to improve companies’ financial performance for
their shareholders. Two companies combine to form a single company that can produce more
revenue than each individual company can do independently, or establish a single company that
eliminates redundant processes and reduce cost of production. Owing to this understanding of
this concept, prospective synergy is evaluated during deliberations on a merger and acquisition
deal. When two companies realize merging will enable them to create greater scale or efficiency
the result is also known as synergy merge.
The rise of Quaker Oats began with the acquisition of Gatorade in 1983. Acquisition of
Gatorade led to better market positioning of Quaker at the top of a beverage market that was untapped. Up to date, the company commands 80% of the beverage market (Winer 1). The
acquisition of Gatorade has enabled Quaker to realize a consistent double-digit growth since
1980s. In 1990s, Quaker’s decision to acquire Snapple another beverage market player gave the
company another opportunity to achieve vital synergies (Winer 1). Even though, Snapple was
not competitive enough to face major market players like Coke and Pepsi, Quaker believed it had
adequate financial resources and vast leadership experience needed to market it and expand
nationally and globally (Winer 2).
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER BELOW TO GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT.
See also, capstone project assignment help in UAE, UK, USA

