What leadership style is best suited to lead people through an organizational change?
What leadership style is best suited to lead people through an organizational change?
An exploration of the leadership styles and competencies required to support organizational transformational change with a focus on the quality engineering team at Dell Computers
Objectives:
1.Critically review theories of the relationship between leadership and organizational change and how this can effect individual teams.
2.Evaluate what leadership style is best suited to lead people through an organizational change
3.Research how transformational change at an organizational level can effect the quality team
4.Recommend if there any leadership or change management best practices that could help the quality organization manage transformational change.
| Criteria (including approximate word limit) | Indicative Weight | Comments |
| Problem definition and objectives, questions, or hypothesis (300 words) | 15% | Background to the research problem. Clarity and definition of the problem and objectives, questions, or hypothesis How focused is the problem/ comprehensiveness of the research objectives, questions or hypothesis and their appropriateness. |
| Methodology – research design, justification of methods sampling etc. ( 400 words) | 20% | Primary and secondary Sources: Explanation of methodology that will be used with reasons for the choices made. Details of data collection tools Information about potential sample Explanation of how data might be analysed |
| Literature review (1200 words) | 60% | Ability demonstrated in selectivity of material reviewed. Evidence of breadth and depth of the material reviewed. Critical review/analysis as opposed to paraphrasing Professionalism shown in quoting, and using other people’s work. Demonstration of a logical conceptual development. |
| Timeline | Overview of stages of the dissertation with suggested dates | |
| Limitations (100 words) | 5% | Identification of possible research limitations / bias |
| Total | 100% |
Dissertation
| Criteria | Indicative Weight | Comments | |
| Abstract / Introduction Problem definition and objectives, questions, or hypothesis | 10 | What is the project about? What was its aim(s) What methodologies were used? What were the key findings? What were the key conclusions? Background to the research problem. Clarity and definition of the problem and objectives, questions, or hypothesis How focused is the problem/ comprehensiveness of the research objectives, questions or hypothesis and their appropriateness. | |
| Methodology – research design, justification of methods sampling etc. Literature review Primary and / or secondary research | 60 | Secondary research methodology: Statement of the information sought and the breadth and depth of sources identified. Assessment of availability, adequacy, accuracy and recency of secondary data. An indication as to how the secondary data has been used within the study. Primary research methodology: Identification of information needs from primary sources. Specification, choice criteria, justification for research philosophy, approach and strategy. Sampling design (sample size and sampling method) Data collection instrument (e.g. questionnaire, interview guide etc), design and pre testing Field work Statement of the analytical considerations Limitations Ability demonstrated in selectivity of material reviewed. Evidence of breadth and depth of the material reviewed. Critical review/analysis as opposed to paraphrasing Professionalism shown in quoting, and using other people’s work. Demonstration of a logical conceptual development. Logical nature of presentation of the primary and / or secondary data. Ability shown in organising the primary and / or secondary findings under logical, thematic headings. Methods used in presenting the primary and / or secondary findings. A variety of methods preferred. | |
| Analysis, synthesis and development of primary and secondary data Conclusions and recommendations | 20 | Ability to use both secondary and primary data findings in conjunction in the analysis. Being able to reason the similarities and differences between secondary and primary data. Skills demonstrated in interpreting the results. Being able to relate the analysis to the research aim and objectives. Depth and synthesis of the results as opposed to mere reporting. Clarity in terms of stating the conclusions/recommendations. Discussion on each. Justification of each. With management implications. Being able to critically reason the conclusions and recommendations in relation to the research aim and objectives. Extent to which the recommendations are realistic in the organisational context. | |
| Reflection on dissertation process | 10 | Ability to explain and provide evidence of the work undertaken during the research process Ability to identify personal skills and provide evidence of these in relation to the dissertation Ability to identify areas of personal development required Critical understanding of the process of reflective practice for self development | |
| Total | 100 |
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER BELOW TO GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT.
See also, capstone project assignment help in UAE, UK, USA
