Wildlife protection versus commercial interest: which should have priority?

Wildlife protection versus commercial interest: which should have priority?

With the increasing human population, thanks to better healthcare systems and longer life expectancy, the human species hunger for resources can only proportionally grow. The growing need for more resources and opportunities to earn a living pits humans against the environment, and in particular, against wildlands and wildlife. Alternative commercial interests enjoy more support for providing numerous, diverse, and interdependent economic benefits to the human species that is considered the center of the environment. Consequently, a struggle between the protection of wildlife and commercial interests has become a major phenomenon. However, conservationists propound for the conservation of the environment for the sustainable life of humans, flora and fauna in the wildlands and extraction of economic benefit from conservation efforts. Wildlife protection is a superior form of interaction between humans and the environment including wildlands and wildlife to commercial interest; it offers a sustainable mode of coexistences between humans and the wildlands including wildlife, coupled with economic benefits from wildlife protection. However, economic interest provides higher economic returns. In this paper, I support the idea that wildlife protection should be given higher priority than commercial interest based on economists and National Wildlife Federation perspectives.

Argument for Wildlife Protection             Little can be done about the extinction of wildlife based on natural factors. However, concerns arise as to the place of human action in the extinction and conservation of wildlife. Human activity impacts the environment and wildlife with the impact being exponential in modern times given the rising population and technology. The conservation philosophy falls into a dichotomy of anthropocentrism and biocentrism. Traditional conservation philosophy is founded on the instrumental value of the environment and wildlife alike: the instrumental-value approach. Wildlife is viewed as secondary while human life and activities take center stage: anthropocentrism (Paterson, 144-150)


smilesmilePLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER BELOW TO GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT. See also, capstone project assignment help in UAE, UK, USA

order here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *